Судебная коллегия по уголовным делам Московского городского суда изменила Приговор Мещанского районного суда города Москвы, которым П. и др. были осуждены по п.п. «а, в» ч. 5 ст. 290 УК РФ, ч. 6 ст. 290 УК РФ к длительным срокам лишения свободы с отбыванием наказания в исправительной колонии строгого режима.
The criminal prosecution of the client with the termination of the criminal case initiated on the fact of evasion from fulfilling the obligation to repatriate money in foreign currency or the currency of the Russian Federation was terminated (clause "a" part 2 article 193 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). Lawyer Bureau Belov D.O. in cooperation with his colleagues, succeeded in stopping the criminal prosecution of his client - a large regional entrepreneur, a manufacturer suspected of evading the obligation to repatriate money in the amount of more than three million US dollars.
The defendant in the criminal case on the illegal sale of narcotic drugs (part 3, article 30, part 4, paragraph "g", st.228.1 of the Criminal Code) changed the measure of restraint in the form of detention for house arrest. Relatives of a client suspected of illicit drug sales turned to the Bureau for legal assistance immediately after his actual detention.
Criminal case of crimes under Part 4 of Art. 160, part 1 of Art. 201 of the Criminal Code, returned to the prosecutor to remove obstacles to its consideration by the court. Since the initiation of the criminal case in 2015, the client's defense was carried out by the lawyer Novokhatsky AA.
Ostankino District Court of Moscow returned to the prosecutor a criminal case of embezzlement committed by an organized group in a particularly large amount (Part 4, Article 160 of the Criminal Code), to remove obstacles to its consideration by the court. During the preliminary hearing, the team of lawyers working on the case managed to prove the inconsistency of the text of the indictment, which was earlier charged.
Ostankino District Court of Moscow sent a criminal case on the theft committed by an organized group on an especially large scale (part 4, article 160 of the Criminal Code of the Russian Federation). During the preliminary hearing, the team of lawyers working on the case managed to prove the violations committed by the Prosecutor General's Office of the Russian Federation in determining the jurisdiction, in connection with which, the criminal case was sent to the Nikulinsky District Court of Moscow for consideration on the merits.